|
Western Countries See Palestinian State08/01 06:26
Plans announced by France, the United Kingdom and Canada to recognize a
Palestinian state won't bring one about anytime soon, though they could further
isolate Israel and strengthen the Palestinians' negotiating position over the
long term.
OTTAWA, Ontario (AP) -- Plans announced by France, the United Kingdom and
Canada to recognize a Palestinian state won't bring one about anytime soon,
though they could further isolate Israel and strengthen the Palestinians'
negotiating position over the long term.
The problem for the Palestinians is that there may not be a long term.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejects Palestinian statehood and
has vowed to maintain open-ended control over annexed east Jerusalem, the
occupied West Bank and the war-ravaged Gaza Strip -- territories Israel seized
in the 1967 war that the Palestinians want for their state.
Israeli leaders favor the outright annexation of much of the West Bank,
where Israel has already built well over 100 settlements housing over 500,000
Jewish settlers. Israel's offensive in Gaza has reduced most of it to a
smoldering wasteland and is pushing it toward famine, and Israel says it is
pressing ahead with plans to relocate much of its population of some 2 million
to other countries.
The United States, the only country with any real leverage over Israel, has
taken its side.
Critics say these countries could do much more
Palestinians have welcomed international support for their decades-long
quest for statehood but say there are more urgent measures Western countries
could take if they wanted to pressure Israel.
"It's a bit odd that the response to daily atrocities in Gaza, including
what is by all accounts deliberate starvation, is to recognize a theoretical
Palestinian state that may never actually come into being," said Khaled
Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University's Center for Contemporary
Arab Studies.
"It looks more like a way for these countries to appear to be doing
something," he said.
Fathi Nimer, a policy fellow at Al-Shabaka, a Palestinian think tank, says
they could have suspended trade agreements with Israel, imposed arms embargoes
or other sanctions. "There is a wide tool set at the disposal of these
countries, but there is no political will to use it," he said.
It's not a completely empty gesture
Most countries in the world recognized Palestinian statehood decades ago,
but Britain and France would be the third and fourth permanent members of the
U.N. Security Council to do so, leaving the U.S. as the only holdout.
"We're talking about major countries and major Israeli allies," said Alon
Pinkas, an Israeli political analyst and former consul general in New York.
"They're isolating the U.S. and they're leaving Israel dependent -- not on the
U.S., but on the whims and erratic behavior of one person, Trump."
Recognition could also strengthen moves to prevent annexation, said Hugh
Lovatt, an expert on the conflict at the European Council on Foreign Relations.
The challenge, he said, "is for those recognizing countries to match their
recognition with other steps, practical steps."
It could also prove significant if Israel and the Palestinians ever resume
the long-dormant peace process, which ground to a halt after Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu returned to office in 2009.
"If and when some kind of negotiations do resume, probably not in the
immediate future, but at some point, it puts Palestine on much more equal
footing," said Julie Norman, a professor of Middle East politics at University
College London.
"It has statehood as a starting point for those negotiations, rather than a
certainly-not-assured endpoint."
Israel calls it a reward for violence
Israel's government and most of its political class were opposed to
Palestinian statehood long before Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack triggered the war.
Netanyahu says creating a Palestinian state would reward Hamas and
eventually lead to an even larger Hamas-run state on Israel's borders. Hamas
leaders have at times suggested they would accept a state on the 1967 borders
but the group remains formally committed to Israel's destruction.
Western countries envision a future Palestinian state that would be
democratic but also led by political rivals of Hamas who accept Israel and help
it suppress the militant group, which won parliamentary elections in 2006 and
seized power in Gaza the following year.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose authority administers parts of
the occupied West Bank, supports a two-state solution and cooperates with
Israel on security matters. He has made a series of concessions in recent
months, including announcing the end to the Palestinian Authority's practice of
providing stipends to the families of prisoners held by Israel and slain
militants.
Such measures, along with the security coordination, have made it deeply
unpopular with Palestinians, and have yet to earn it any favors from Israel or
the Trump administration. Israel says Abbas is not sincerely committed to peace
and accuses him of tolerating incitement and militancy.
Lovatt says there is much to criticize about the PA, but that "often the
failings of the Palestinian leadership are exaggerated in a way to relieve
Israel of its own obligations."
The tide may be turning, but not fast enough
If you had told Palestinians in September 2023 that major countries were on
the verge of recognizing a state, that the U.N.'s highest court had ordered
Israel to end the occupation, that the International Criminal Court had ordered
Netanyahu's arrest, and that prominent voices from across the U.S. political
spectrum were furious with Israel, they might have thought their dream of
statehood was at hand.
But those developments pale in comparison to the ongoing war in Gaza and
smaller but similarly destructive military offensives in the West Bank.
Israel's military victories over Iran and its allies have left it the dominant
and nearly unchallenged military power in the region, and Trump is the
strongest supporter it has ever had in the White House.
"This (Israeli) government is not going to change policy," Pinkas said. "The
recognition issue, the ending of the war, humanitarian aid -- that's all going
to have to wait for another government."
|
|